521
Bag or Box in which Post Letters are conveyed.
Vessel shall include any ship or other vessel not a Post Office Packet, i.e. not conveying Post Letters under Contract.
6.
By the 12th section of the same Act, Pecuniary Penalties imposed by the Post Office Acts may be sued for (within a year see : 24) in any of the Supreme Courts of that part of Her Majesty's Dominions in which the offence was committed. Penalties not exceeding £20 are also recoverable before Justices of the Peace (sec. 13).
7. By the 39th section of the same Act, where offences punishable under the Post Office Acts are committed within the jurisdiction of the Admiralty, the same may be tried in the same manner as any other offence committed within that jurisdiction.
8. Applying this summary to the cases mentioned by M. Lister - I am of opinion:
a. In the Foochow case, that the master of the steamer did not commit a breach of the Law in refusing to take a mail: the first part of the section applies only to vessels outward bound from the United Kingdom.
b. In the case of the Cheviot (assuming wilful delay to be proved), that the vessel, although not outward bound within the terms of the provisions against wilful delay, that the Consulate...
521
Bag or Box te in which Post Letters are conveyed.
Vessel shall include any ship other vessel not a Post Office Packet. i.c.
not conveying Post Letters under Contract.
6.
By the 12th section of the same det- Pecuniary Penalties imposed by the Post
Office Acts
may
be sued for (within
ناه
was
year see : 24 ) in any of the Supreme - Courts of that part of Her Majesty's - Dominions in which the offence committed. Penalties not exceeding £ 20 are also recoverable before Qustices of the Peace (sec. 13).
7. By the 39th section of the same act where offences punishable under the Post Office Acts are committed within
the
the jurisdiction of the Admiralty, the same
may
be tried in the same manner as
any
other offence committed within that jurisdiction.
8. Applying this summary to the cases mentioned by M. Lister - I am of opinion:
a. In the Foochow case that the master
of the steamer did not commit a breach of the Law in refusing to take a
mail : the first part of the section applies only to vessels outward bound from the United Kingdom.
b. In the case of the Cheviot (assuming wilful delay to be proved) that the
vessel altho' not outward bound within the terms of the provisions
against wilful delay, that the
Consulate
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.